ARTICLE DOI: 10.31480/2330-4871/152

Research Article | Volume 9 | Issue 2 Open Access

The Role of Pulmonary Function Test in Perioperative Management of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis

Mariel Manzor, BS, Gabor Asztalos, BS and Koichi Yuki, MD*

Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Cardiac Anesthesia Division, Boston Children's Hospital, USA

*Corresponding author: Koichi Yuki, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Cardiac Anesthesia Division, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Boston Children's Hospital, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA, 02115, USA, Tel: 1-617-355-6225, Fax: 1-627-730-0799, Email: koichi.yuki@childrens.harvard.edu

Editor: Renyu Liu, MD, PhD, Professor, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Center of Penn Global Health Scholar, 336 John Morgan building, 3620 Hamilton Walk, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA, Fax: 2153495078, E-mail: RenYu.Liu@pennmedicine.upenn.edu

Received: March 28, 2022 | Accepted: May 31, 2022 | Published: June 06, 2022

Citation: Manzor M, Asztalos G, Yuki K. The Role of Pulmonary Function Test in Perioperative Management of Patients with Cystic Fibrosis. Transl Perioper & Pain Med 2022; 9(2):438-444


Abstract


Cystic fibrosis (CF) is one of chronic illness affecting many different organs. Although the outcome of CF patients undergoing procedures was not favorable more than half a century ago, it showed a continuous improvement based on the previous reports. However, recent outcome report of CF patients' procedural outcomes is limited. We analyzed CF patients who underwent procedures from 2010 to 2020 in our institution. The mortality of 1,903 procedures performed in 430 CF patients was 0.74%, seen in high-risk procedures such as lung transplantation. We also analyzed the perioperative profiles of CF patients who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS). We identified the preoperative pulmonary function testing result to be predictive of postoperative hospital stay.

Background


Cystic Fibrosis (CF) is a multisystem disorder resulting from pathogenic mutations in the CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) gene. The CFTR protein transports chloride and bicarbonate across the apical surface of secretory epithelia in various tissues and organs including lung and pancreas [1,2]. CF-causing CFTR mutations lead either to diminished or defective CFTR protein, resulting in decreased chloride transport. The impairment of chloride transport causes thick and viscous mucus to accumulate, causing a variety of complications including chronic lung infections, pancreatic and liver dysfunction, and reduced fertility [3].

Patients with CF not only receive medical treatment but also undergo a multitude of surgeries for CF-related or non-related medical issues [4]. Earlier studies demonstrated the drastic improvement of surgical outcome in CF patients; Salanitre, et al. reported the perioperative mortality of 27% in 135 surgeries for CF patients from 1945 to 1962 [5]. In the series from 1959 to 1970 by Doershuk, et al., there was a mortality rate of 4% in 144 surgical procedures [6]. Olsen, et al. reported a significantly reduced mortality rate of 0.5% in 578 surgeries from 1970 to 1985 [7].

The improvement of CF care has steadily increased the life-expectancy. Over 50% of CF patients reach adulthood, and those in high income countries live longer than 40 years [8]. As surgical, medical treatment, and anesthetic management have continued to show an improvement, it is not infrequent to see more complex procedures performed. Because recent literature analyzing perioperative outcomes in CF patients is limited, our primary objective was to examine the type of procedures and the outcomes of CF patients. In addition, we determined the risk factors contributing to longer hospital stays following one of common surgical procedures functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) in CF patients.

Methods


Methods

Following the institutional review board (IRB) approval, the retrospective chart review was performed. Informed consent was exempted. We identified procedures performed for patients with CF at Boston Children's Hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. CF was diagnosed with a sweat test and/or a blood-based genetic test. To examine the type of procedures that CF patients underwent from 2010 to 2020, we used the electronic medical record to obtain patient demographics, and type of procedures. We included all the CF patients who underwent procedures during the study period. To further study the recovery characteristics of CF patients undergoing one of the common procedures FESS, we also extracted their American Society of Anesthesia (ASA) physical status classification, postoperative length of hospital stays, and pulmonary function tests (PFTs) within 6 months preoperatively and postoperatively. In addition, we sought for the presence of CF related complications as well as the type of CFTR mutations. For genetic makeup, homozygous corresponds to patients having two F508del mutations, heterozygous corresponds to patients having one F508del mutation [9], and unknown corresponds to patients whose genetic mutation was unknown from the medical record. For the study of FESS, we excluded patients who did not have perioperative PFTs. We also did not include patients who already received lung transplantation at the time of FESS.

Statistical analysis

We report categorical variables as number and percentage, and continuous variables as mean and standard deviation for normally distributed variables or median and interquartile range for variables with skewed distribution. Normality was examined using Shapiro-Wilk normality test. We compared the proportions of categorical variables with λ2 test and assessed the distribution of continuous variables with independence sample t test (student t test) or Mann-Whitney test for potential risk factors for prolonged hospital length of stay postoperatively. The results were also expressed as odds ratio [1] and 95% confidence interval (CI). Cutoff values were determined using Youden-J statistics. Analysis was performed using STATA (College Station, TX).

Results


Characteristics of CF patients undergoing procedures and the type of procedures

We identified 1,903 procedures performed in 430 CF patients during the study period (Table 1). Median age was 15-years-old, with roughly equal number of males and females. Age distribution was shown in Figure 1. Highest number of procedures was peaked at age of 16 years in our cohort. 5 patients died during the same admission following procedures. These 5 patients had total of 14 procedures during the admission, indicating 0.74% of procedural mortality rate.

Figure 1: Age distribution and number of procedures.
The relationship between age (year) of cystic fibrosis (CF) patients and the number of procedures from 2010 to 2020 was shown.

Table 1: The characteristics of cystic fibrosis patients.

Total patients

430 patients

Age

15.0 (9.0, 20.0)

Gender

Male 223, Female 207

Race

White 357 (83.0%)

Total procedures

1903 cases

Average procedures/patient

4.4 cases

Table 2 showed the summary of procedures. Peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) line placement was the most frequent procedure, followed by flexible bronchoscopy and bronchioalveolar lavage and FESS. Table 3 showed common procedures per different age group. While PICC line was the most common procedure among all age groups, FESS was more commonly performed after 10-years-old (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Age distribution and number of FESS procedures.
The relationship between age (year) of CF patients and the number of FESS procedures from 2010 to 2020 was shown.
FESS: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Table 2: Procedural profiles of cystic fibrosis patients.

Type of procedures

Number of cases

PICC line placement

602 (31.63%)

Flexible bronchoscopy/bronchioalveolar lavage

217 (11.40%)

FESS (limited, complex)

211 (11.09%)

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

133 (6.99%)

Port-A-cath placement

81 (4.26%)

Gastrostomy

43 (2.26%)

Colonoscopy

42 (2.21%)

Cystoscopy

34 (1.79%)

Laparotomy

30 (1.58%)

Direct laryngoscopy and/or bronchoscopy

29 (1.52%)

Lung transplant

20 (1.05%)

Hernia repair

17 (0.89%)

Gastrocutaneous fistula closure

11 (0.58%)

Liver transplant recipient

10 (0.53%)

Arthroscopy (ankle, knee, elbow, or shoulder)

10 (0.53%)

Laparoscopic Appendectomy

8 (0.42%)

Others

405 (21.28%)

Total

1903

PICC: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter; FESS: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Table 3: Procedural profiles per age group.

Type of procedures

Number of cases

 

 

0-5 years

271

 

PICC line placement

40 (14.76%)

 

Flexible bronchoscopy/bronchioalveolar lavage

23 (8.49%)

 

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

21 (7.75%)

 

Laparotomy

19 (7.01%)

 

Gastrostomy

17 (6.27%)

 

Direct laryngoscopy and/or bronchoscopy

15 (5.54%)

 

FESS

9 (3.32%)

 

Tonsillectomy/Tonsillotomy

8 (2.95%)

 

Colonoscopy

7 (2.58%)

 

Hernia repair

7 (2.58%)

 

6-10 years

321

 

 

PICC placement

73 (22.4%)

 

Flexible bronchoscopy/bronchioalveolar lavage

47 (14.64%)

 

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

29 (9.03%)

 

FESS

31 (9.66%)

 

Port-A-cath placement

11 (3.43%)

 

Lung transplant

7 (2.18%)

 

11-15 years

412

 

 

PICC placement

134 (32.52%)

 

FESS

70 (16.99%)

 

Flexible bronchoscopy/bronchioalveolar lavage

52 (12.62%)

 

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

36 (8.74%)

 

Colonoscopy

11 (2.67%)

 

Gastrostomy

9 (2.18%)

 

Port-A-cath placement

8 (1.94%)

 

16-20 years

475

 

 

PICC placement

157 (33.05%)

 

Flexible bronchoscopy/bronchioalveolar lavage

68 (14.32%)

 

FESS

57 (12.00%)

 

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

19 (4.00%)

 

Odontectomy

15 (3.16%)

 

Port-A-cath placement

13 (2.74%)

 

Cystoscopy

10 (2.11%)

 

Arthroscopy (ankle, knee, elbow, or shoulder)

10 (2.11%)

 

 

21-25 years

PICC placement

297

126 (42.42%)

 

 

 

FESS

35 (11.78%)

 

Flexible bronchoscopy/bronchioalveolar lavage

20 (6.73%)

 

Esophagogastroduodenoscopy

20 (5.73%)

 

Cystoscopy

14 (4.71%)

 

26 years-

127

 

 

PICC placement

69 (54.33%)

 

FESS

9 (7.09%)

 

Cystoscopy

8 (6.30%)

 

Flexible bronchoscopy/bronchioalveolar lavage

8 (6.30%)

 

PICC: Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter; FESS: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

The recovery profiles of CF patients undergoing FESS

Because PICC line is a less invasive procedure compared to others, we chose to study the perioperative characteristics of CF patients undergoing FESS (Figure 3). We identified 119 patients who underwent total of 211 FESS procedures (Table 4). Median age was 15-years-old. No mortality was observed in the cohort. 192 of patients undergoing FESS had PFTs within 6 months before and after the surgery (Figure 3). Usually patients who undergo FESS procedures are discharged home on the same day or next day. We determined the factors associated with hospital stays ≥ 2 days following the procedure. We identified 62 patients who stayed ≥ 2 days (Group B) and 130 patients who were discharged home by the following day after surgery (Group A). Patients in Group B were slightly older by average (Table 5). BMI was lower in Group B. The PFT values in Group B were worse compared to the ones in Group A. On the other hand, gender, weight, ASA status, the complexity of FESS, the type of genetic mutations, and the number and type of CF related non-respiratory complications were not associated with longer hospital stay. We further determined the cutoff value of the parameters associated with longer hospital stay using Youden-J statistics. The cutoffs which determine whether a patient is likely to spend two or more nights in the hospital following FESS procedure were as follows: ≥ 18-years-old, Pre-%FVC ≤ 87, Pre-%FEV1 ≤ 81, Pre-%FEV1/FVC ≤ 83, Pre-%FEF25-75 ≤ 60, Post-%FVC ≤ 92, Post-%FEV1 ≤ 81, Post-%FEV1/FVC ≤ 80, and Post-%FEF25-75 ≤ 58 (Table 6). Given that each PFT parameter was shown helpful to predict hospital stays ≥ 2 days, we also examined the correlation between the duration of hospital stay and each PFT parameter using linear regression analysis. As predicted, there was a trend that each PFT parameter value was lower in patients with longer hospital stay, although r2 value was relatively low (Supplemental Figure 1).

Figure 3: The flow diagram of identifying patients who underwent FESS procedures for analysis
FESS: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Supplemental Figure 1: The relationship between the duration of postoperative hospital stayand PFTs in patients who underwent FESS.
X-axis and y-axis showed the duration of postoperative hospital stay and each PFT value. The relationship between the parameters was analyzed using linear regression analysis.
PFT: Pulmonary Function Test; FESS: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery

Table 4: The characteristics of cystic fibrosis patients undergoing FESS procedures.

Total patients

119 patients

Age

15.0 (11.0, 19.0)

Gender

Male 59, Female 60

Race

White 107 (89.9%)

Total procedures

211 cases

Average procedures/patient

1.8 cases

FESS: Functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Table 5: Risk factor analysis of longer hospital stay following FESS procedures.

 

Hospital stay < 2 days

n = 130

>= 2 days

n = 62

O.R.

95% CI

p value

Age

15.01+/- 5.15

17.32+/- 6.04

1.08

1.03-1.14

0.008

Gender

male 64 (49.23%) female 66 (50.77%)

male 28 (45.16%)

female 34 (54.84%)

0.85

0.46-1.56

0.598

Weight

49.57+/- 15.01

50.33 +/- 14.17

1.004

0.98-1.02

0.737

BMI

20.00 (18.18, 22.50)

19.00 (16.50, 21.00)

0.887

0.80-0.99

0.026

FESS type

limited 70 (53.85%) complex 60 (46.15%)

limited 28 (45.16%) complex 34 (54.84%)

0.71

0.38-1.30

0.261

ASA

Class I 0 (0%)

Class I (0%)

1.87

0.96-3.67

0.067

 

Class II 47 (36.15%)

Class II 15 (24.19%)

     
 

Class III 83 (63.85%)

Class III 46 (74.19%)

     
 

Class IV (0%)

Class IV (1.61%)

     

Pre-%FVC

101.0 (91.0, 110.0)

84.0 (63.75, 101.5)

0.96

0.94-0.97

<0.001

Pre-%FEV1

94.0 (81.75, 109.0)

73.50 (45.75, 93.8)

0.97

0.95-0.98

< 0.001

Pre-%FEV1/FVC

88.0 (83.0, 95.0)

84.0 (72.0, 92.3)

0.95

0.93-0.98

< 0.001

Pre-%FEF25-75

82.0 (61.0, 105.0)

51.5 (21.0, 81.0)

0.98

0.96-0.98

< 0.001

Post-%FVC

98.5 (87.8, 111.0)

84.0 (60.8, 98.5)

0.96

0.94-0.98

< 0.001

Post-%FEV1

94.0 (80.0, 106.0)

75.0 (42.0, 93.3)

0.97

0.96-0.98

< 0.001

Post-%FEV1/FVC

88.0 (82.0, 95.0)

85.0 (69.8, 91.0)

0.96

0.94-0.99

0.002

Post-%FEF25-75

83.0 (55.8, 104.0)

55.0 (22.8, 84.0)

0.98

0.97-0.99

< 0.001

Genetic

Homozygous 37 (28.46%)

Homozygous 17 (27.42%)

1.02

0.47-2.20

0.969

 

Heterozygous 45 (34.62%)

Heterozygous 21 (33.87%)

   
 

Unknown 48 (36.92%)

Unknown 24 (38.71%)

     

CF non-respiratory complications

1 (1, 2)

2 (1, 2)

1.11

0.77-1.58

0.58

CF non-respiratory complication number

0-23 (17.69%)

0-11 (17.74%)

     

1-50 (38.46%)

1-19 (30.63%)

     

2-48 (36.92%)

2-28 (45.16%)

     

3-9 (6.92%)

3-4 (4.84%)

     

Chronic sinusitis

83 (63.36%)

40 (64.52%)

1.03

0.55-1.94

0.928

Pancreatic insufficiency

78 (59.54%)

41 (66.13%)

1.3

0.69-2.44

0.414

Liver disease

12 (9.16%)

6 (9.68%)

1.05

0.38-2.95

0.921

FESS: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; FVC: Forced Vital Capacity; FEV1: Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second; FEF25-75: Forced Expiratory Flow At 25-75% Of The Forced Vital Capacity; CF: Cystic Fibrosis

Table 6: Cutoff values of PFTs in cystic fibrosis patients who had hospital stays > or = 2 days after FESS procedures.

 

Cutoff value

AUC

 

 

 

Age

> = 18-year-old

0.61

 

 

Pre-%FVC

< = 87

0.71

 

 

Pre-%FEV1

< = 81

0.73

 

 

Pre-%FEV1/FVC

< = 83

0.63

 

 

Pre-%FEF25-75

< = 60

0.73

 

 

Post-%FVC

< = 92

0.71

 

 

Post-%FEV1

< = 81

0.71

 

 

Post-%FEV1/FVC

< = 80

0.63

 

 

Post-%FEF25-75

< = 58

0.69

 

 

PFT: Pulmonary Function Test; FESS: Functional Endoscopic Sinus Surgery; AUC: Area under the Curve; FVC: Forced Vital Capacity; FEV1: Forced Expiratory Volume in the First Second; FEF25-75: Forced Expiratory Flow at 25-75% of the Forced Vital Capacity; CF: Cystic Fibrosis

Discussion


Our single institutional data analysis showed the mortality rate of CF patients following procedures was 0.74%, similar to what Olsen, et al. reported using the data from 1970-1985. In the study by Olsen, et al. the majority of procedures were nasal polypectomy and vascular access procedures in patients with the median age of 16 years, which is quite similar to the characteristics of our cohort. However, our cohort also included more invasive procedures such as liver and lung transplantations. In the Olsen cohort, three patient died (3/578 cases, 0.52%); One underwent lobectomy and two underwent surgeries for meconium ileus. In our cohort, two patients died following lung transplantation, two patients following tracheostomy and one after flexible bronchoscopy. Patients who underwent lung transplantation had multiple procedures following lung transplantations. Because some of our procedural profiles were not exactly the same with ones in Olsen study, it is difficult to simply compare two results from the mortality standpoint. However, it is safe to say that the outcome of CF patients following most of procedures is overall good from the mortality perspective.

Acknowledging their overall favorable outcomes, it is important to understand their perioperative profiles. For this purpose, we examined the perioperative course of patients undergoing FESS, realizing that some of CF patients required hospital stays more than one night. PFTs are not required as a routine preoperative testing in the majority of surgical procedures. Our analysis showed that PFT could be a useful predictive test for the longer duration of postoperative stay after surgical procedures in CF patients. We presented the cutoff values that likely help to determine patients who require hospital stay > or = 2 nights following the procedures. Age was also a risk factor, which likely indicates the progressive nature of CF disease in the lungs. Interestingly, the presence and the type of non-respiratory CF related complications did not show any association with longer postoperative hospital stay.

Although our study describes current perioperative status of CF patients, it has some limitations. First, this is retrospective in nature. Second, our study only represents our institutional experience and further investigation across other institutions is necessary. Third, we examined the use of PFTs only in FESS procedures. Analyzing other procedures will be important to see if our observation is relevant to many procedures.

In conclusion, the outcome of CF patients is overall favorable. In our institutional data, PFT may be a useful testing to be included in CF patients to predict their postoperative length of stay.

Conflict of Interest


None.

Financial Support


CHMC Anesthesia Foundation (K.Y.), NIH AI158886 (K.Y.).

References


  1. Rowe, S. M., Miller, S. & Sorscher, E. J. Cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med352, 1992-2001, doi:10.1056/NEJMra043184 (2005).
  2. Shteinberg, M., Haq, I. J., Polineni, D. & Davies, J. C. Cystic fibrosis. Lancet397, 2195-2211, doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(20)32542-3 (2021).
  3. Cohen, T. S. & Prince, A. Cystic fibrosis: a mucosal immunodeficiency syndrome. Nat Med18, 509-519, doi:10.1038/nm.2715 (2012).
  4. Castellani, C. & Assael, B. M. Cystic fibrosis: a clinical view. Cell Mol Life Sci74, 129-140, doi:10.1007/s00018-016-2393-9 (2017).
  5. Salanitre, E., Klonymus, D. & Rockow, H. Anesthetic Experience in Children with Cystic Fibrosis of the Pancreas. Anesthesiology25, 801-807, doi:10.1097/00000542-196411000-00011 (1964).
  6. Doershuk, C. F., Reyes, A. L., Regan, A. G. & Matthews, L. W. Anesthesia and surgery in cystic fibrosis. Anesth Analg51, 413-421 (1972).
  7. Olsen, M. M., Gauderer, M. W., Girz, M. K. & Izant, R. J., Jr. Surgery in patients with cystic fibrosis. J Pediatr Surg22, 613-618, doi:10.1016/s0022-3468(87)80111-2 (1987).
  8. Elborn, J. S., Bell, S. C., Madge, S. L., Burgel, P. R., Castellani, C., Conway, S., De Rijcke, K., Dembski, B., Drevinek, P., Heijerman, H. G., Innes, J. A., Lindblad, A., Marshall, B., Olesen, H. V., Reimann, A. L., Sole, A., Viviani, L., Wagner, T. O., Welte, T. & Blasi, F. Report of the European Respiratory Society/European Cystic Fibrosis Society task force on the care of adults with cystic fibrosis. Eur Respir J47, 420-428, doi:10.1183/13993003.00592-2015 (2016).
  9. Davies, J. C., Sermet-Gaudelus, I., Naehrlich, L., Harris, R. S., Campbell, D., Ahluwalia, N., Short, C., Haseltine, E., Panorchan, P., Saunders, C., Owen, C. A., Wainwright, C. E. & Group, V. X. I. A phase 3, double-blind, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tezacaftor in combination with ivacaftor in participants 6 through 11 years of age with cystic fibrosis homozygous for F508del or heterozygous for the F508del-CFTR mutation and a residual function mutation. J Cyst Fibros20, 68-77, doi:10.1016/j.jcf.2020.07.023 (2021).